
I've watched hundreds of writers over 50 make the same mistake, and I've made it myself. We obsess over subscriber counts and engagement metrics while completely missing the obvious truth: we're writing for an imaginary audience that doesn't match the actual humans reading our work.
Here's what I mean. Last month, I reviewed my analytics and discovered something unsettling. My real subscribers skewed heavily toward my age group—seasoned professionals, retirees, people with disposable income and a lifetime of reading habits. Yet when I examined my recent posts, I realized I'd been writing like I was trying to impress a 30-year-old editor at a tech startup. Shorter sentences. Trendy references. A pace that assumed everyone was scrolling between meetings.
Wrong audience. Wrong approach. And probably costing me actual paying subscribers.
I call it a reader avatar audit, and it takes maybe 20 minutes. Pull up your last ten posts and read them as if you're a stranger, and be brutally honest.
Ask yourself: Who am I actually writing this for? Not who you hope is reading, but who you're unconsciously targeting with your word choices, cultural references, pace, and the problems you're addressing.
Pace & tone: Is this written at a breathless, TikTok-swipe pace? Does it sound like me, or does it sound like I'm trying to be a 30-year-old life coach? Did I write it for a mobile phone only?
Cultural references: Am I referencing social media trends, "the current discourse," or hustle-culture bros I have nothing in common with? Am I trying too hard to sound hip?
Problems addressed: Am I talking about "scaling my side hustle" and "crushing my goals"? Or am I talking about the real, nuanced, complex problems people with 50+ years of life experience actually face? (Think: career pivots, legacy, finding new purpose, navigating complex relationships, "what now?").
Assumed knowledge: Am I over-explaining simple concepts (like what a 401k is) or am I trusting my reader is an intelligent adult who has lived a life?
By the time you get to post #10, you'll have your answer. You'll see exactly who you've been writing for: a real person or a phantom.
When I did this, I found patterns I hadn't noticed. I was explaining technology like my readers had never used a computer. I was avoiding longer, more complex sentences because some blog guru said attention spans are dying. I was referencing current pop culture when I should have been drawing from the deep well of experience my actual readers share with me.
The revelation hit hard: I was chasing an algorithm-defined audience that doesn't actually pay for content, while ignoring the demographic that has both money and loyalty. People our age—the ones who still believe in paying for quality work, who have the patience for depth, who actually finish what they start reading.
The solution isn't complicated, but it requires letting go of some deeply ingrained habits.
Stop trying to game the algorithm. Stop writing like you're auditioning for a publication that folded five years ago. Stop dumbing down your vocabulary and shortening your thoughts to accommodate people who were never going to subscribe anyway.
Instead, write like you're sending a letter to someone exactly your age who shares your experience. Someone who gets your references because they lived through the same decades. Someone who appreciates nuance and doesn't need everything explained in bullet points (ironic, given my current format, but you get the idea). Someone who has enough life experience to recognize authenticity when they see it.
This audience exists. They're already reading you. They have discretionary income and they're willing to spend it on writing that speaks directly to them rather than past them. But they're being systematically ignored by writers desperate to appeal to a demographic that frankly doesn't care.
I made the shift about six weeks ago. I stopped second-guessing my sentence length. I referenced books and movies from the 70s and 80s without apologizing. I wrote about problems that matter to people who've been around long enough to see patterns repeat. I trusted that my peers would appreciate being treated like the intelligent, experienced readers they are.
The results? My paid subscription rate nearly doubled. Not because I got more traffic, but because I finally started connecting with the people who were already there.
Your real readers—the ones worth writing for—are probably closer to your age than you think. They're tired of being pandered to by algorithms and trend-chasing. They want substance, honesty, and someone who talks to them like an equal rather than a target demographic.
Do yourself a favor. Run that audit. Look at who you're actually writing for versus who's actually reading. Then make a choice: keep chasing phantoms, or start writing for the people who might actually pay you.
I can tell you which strategy will grow your income and visibility faster.
This is the core of my Write-Earn-Repeat system: Write something true, earn the trust (and the sale) from a reader who gets it, and repeat the process.
Okay, did you do the audit? What did you find? Come tell us about your real reader in the Pen2Profit writers group: A Writer's Career Playbook. It's free.
A place for writers who want to learn to earn more with their storytelling, non-fiction, and fiction.
Pen2Profit Properties
Blog Categories

RETURN POLICY/Delivery Policy
©2025-2026 All Rights Reserved Maryan Pelland Pen2Profit©